Presenters

Source

🚀 Leonard’s Security Vision: Reinventing System Security for the Future 🛠️

For decades, Unix and Linux have been the bedrock of modern computing. But as threats evolve, can these venerable systems truly keep pace? In a thought-provoking presentation, Leonard challenged fundamental assumptions about system security, advocating for a radical redesign that prioritizes isolation, measurement, and a rejection of legacy practices. This isn’s about patching vulnerabilities; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how we build secure systems.

🎯 The Core Problem: Legacy Design’s Achilles’ Heel

Leonard’s central argument boils down to this: the current Unix and Linux security models are fundamentally flawed. They rely on practices that, while functional in the past, are increasingly vulnerable in today’s threat landscape. The presentation wasn’t a critique for critique’s sake, but a passionate call to action - a roadmap for a more secure future.

🧱 Key Issues & Proposed Solutions: A Radical Overhaul

Here’s a breakdown of Leonard’s core criticisms and his proposed solutions, presented in a way that’s actionable and understandable:

  • Say Goodbye to SUID: The suid bit, allowing binaries to gain elevated privileges, is deemed a “terrible” design. Leonard champions Inter-Process Communication (IPC) as a safer alternative. This is a big deal – removing suid will likely require significant code changes and could impact compatibility.
  • Capabilities: A Double-Edged Sword: While theoretically useful, Linux’s implementation of capabilities is flawed, particularly the “capability admin” feature. Leonard proposes disabling them entirely or severely limiting their use with “PR control.”
  • Beyond “Everything’s a File”: The Unix principle of treating everything as a file breaks down when dealing with resources like System V semaphores and shared memory. Leonard advocates for treating these as distinct entities with unique access control mechanisms.
  • The Netlink Nightmare: Leonard views Netlink as a significant security risk due to its inconsistent rules and API.
  • Data Integrity & Authentication: Mandatory authentication before any data interaction is a cornerstone of Leonard’s vision. This means no kernel objects are realized before authentication.
  • Factory Reset & Data Erasure: A critical feature for restoring system integrity, involving writable partition erasure and TPM resets.
  • Measurement is Key: All actions, from boot phases to privilege escalations, must be meticulously measured and logged for auditability. This includes “observe” and “track” capabilities.
  • LSVPF: A New Security Framework: Leonard proposes LSVPF, a framework for security policy enforcement.

💾 Tools, Technologies & Frameworks: Building the Future

Leonard’s vision requires a combination of existing and emerging technologies:

  • Linux Kernel: The primary focus of the redesign.
  • Systemd: Leonard’s project, slated to eliminate suid and fcaps binaries.
  • DM variety: A technology for data integrity verification.
  • TPM (Trusted Platform Module): Used for key material isolation and enclave creation.
  • Vlink IPC: Inter-Process Communication model enabling natural delegation.
  • PR control: A mechanism to disable suid and fcaps binaries.

🌐 Tradeoffs & Challenges: The Road Ahead

Implementing Leonard’s vision isn’t without significant hurdles:

  • Backward Compatibility: Removing core features like suid will likely break compatibility with existing software.
  • Implementation Effort: Overhauling fundamental security designs requires substantial engineering effort and kernel-level changes.
  • Adoption: Widespread adoption requires a shift in mindset and practices across the Linux ecosystem.
  • Complexity: Leonard acknowledged that the proposed changes would likely increase system complexity, requiring careful consideration of usability and maintainability.

✨ Audience Interaction & Key Takeaways

The Q&A session highlighted some key areas of focus:

  • Enabling the “no-new-privilege” flag: Leonard believes distributions need to prioritize enabling this flag.
  • Capabilities Replacement: He expressed a desire for a properly implemented capabilities model, but until that happens, disabling them is the safer option.

Leonard’s presentation isn’t just about fixing vulnerabilities; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how we build secure systems for the future. It’s a bold vision that challenges the status quo and offers a roadmap for a more robust and trustworthy computing landscape. It’s a call to action for developers, security professionals, and the entire Linux community to embrace a new era of system hardening and design.

Appendix